....And if the cloud bursts, thunder in your ear
You shout and no one seems to hear.
And if the band you're in starts playing different tunes
I'll see you on the dark side of the moon.
"Brain Damage," Roger Waters - Dark Side of the Moon, Pink Floyd (1973)*
Today is the 40th anniversary of man’s greatest technical achievement – the landing of Apollo 11 on the surface of the Moon and the first men to walk on the lunar landscape. From a speech made by President John Kennedy to Congress in 1961, the collective minds of the best and the brightest took on this challenge - to send a man to the Moon and return him safely before the decade’s end. It was the pinnacle of success for a program that actually believed it could take man where no man had never gone before. The expansion of education with respect to Earth's development and history was truly geometric.However, the modus operandi of the NASA-Lunar manned program (Mercury, Gemini, Apollo) was not entirely altruistic – to expand the base of human knowledge. The primary drive for Kennedy’s rush to land on the Moon was to get there before the hated and dreaded commies – aka the Soviets - got there. After all the Russians surprised (or rather humiliated) the Americans by launching Sputnik in October 1957 – becoming the first country to put a satellite into orbit. The “Space Race," as the competitive battle of rocket technology and astronomy became to be known, was in fact just an extension of the political Cold War between the US and USSR. Fortunately for the planet, this chapter of the Cold War actually worked to benefit human knowledge and society (unlike the more deadly Arms Race and Proxy Wars that also sprung up during the 1960’s).
In fact, the success of the Apollo missions owes something to the achievements of the Soviet Lunar Program – know as Luna, even if it was just the competitive spirit.
Over a seventeen year period – 1959 to 1976, the Soviets Union launched 46 missions for lunar exploration. 15 were successful – either by entering orbit or landing on the moon. Many were unsuccessful or downright failures – but many of those details were not released to the world at-large until after the demise of the Soviet Union in 1991.Some of the highlights of Luna are as follows:
- The first three missions in 1958 all failed on launch.
- Luna 1 was launched Jan 2, 1959 and was the first artificial satellite to reach the moon. The craft flew by on Jan 4 and then continued on, where it went into orbit around the Sun.
- Luna 2 was launched Sept 12, 1959. It became the first spacecraft to reach the surface of the Moon, as it crashed to the surface on Sept 14.
Luna 3 sent back the first pictures of the far (or dark) side of the Moon on Oct 18, 1959.- Luna 4 did not receive a course correction and missed the Moon completely
- Luna 9 became the first spacecraft to make a soft landing on the Moon – Feb 3, 1966. Transmissions and photos were sent back to Earth for 3 days – the first ever from an extraterrestrial body.
- Luna 10 became the first spacecraft to orbit the Moon on Apr 1, 1966. Luna 10 made 460 orbits and transmitted data back to Earth through May 30, 1966.
- On December 24, 1966, Luna 13 landed on the Moon. The spacecraft sent back panoramic images of the surface for 4 days, when the batteries failed.
- Luna 15 was launched on Jul 13, 1969 - 3 days before Apollo 11 with the purpose of landing a robotic probe on the moon, collecting rocks and then returning to Earth – all before Apollo 11. The Soviets wanted to steal some of the thunder from the American manned mission. Luna 15 entered lunar orbit on July 17. When the Russian controllers finally fired the rockets to land, Luna 15 crashed into the Moon – a day after Armstrong and Aldrin had set down.
Luna 16 was the first robotic probe to land on the Moon and return a sample of Moon rocks to Earth. The craft landed on the surface Sep 20, 1970 – 26 hours later the upper stage lifted off and returned to Earth with 101 grams of soil.- Luna 17 carried the first rover to the Moon in Nov 1970. It remained operational until Oct 1971.
- Luna 20 landed on the Moon Feb 21, 1972. The probe drilled for lunar samples and returned to Earth four days later.
- Luna 21 carried the second rover vehicle – Lunokhod 2 - to the Moon on Jan 15, 1973. The rover took over 80,000 pictures and performed soil tests. To help the Soviets with this mission, the Americans gave the Russians photos taken by Apollo 17 to assist in navigating the landing. A few months later, the rover ended up in a crater and became covered in dust – terminating its mission on May 9. 1973.
- Luna 24 was the final mission of the Luna Program. The craft landed in Mare Crisium and safely returned soil samples to Earth on Aug 22, 1976.
Since Luna 24, no nation has landed on the moon.
*one of my favorite albums of all time



18 comments:
Now we're racing against the communist Chinese who plan to go to the moon, then onto Mars in the very near future.
We seem to accomplish the most when we're in a competitive situation with a nation sharing a similar goal. Then, we step up and get things done.
I really can't believe it's been 40 years since we were last on the moon. We should've been colonizing the satellite by now and using it as a launch point for deeper space exploration.
Hi Cap;
Luna has a very impressive history.
We get so much garbage fed to us in the media, particularly in respect to nationalism, that you feel you are the greatest in the world and all other countries peoples IQ's are a few points lower and they could not possibly compete once the American will is challenged.
We can see from this post that is not the truth, but the contributions to technology by other countries are vast indeed.
The most reliable bus to the space station is the Russian one.
A good case can be made that if there hadn't been the Cold War and then the Space Race we might not be doing what we doing, that is, all that push and shove between the US and the USSR also produced our personal computers and internet. Those and many other techie wonders too.
Thanks for this, Dcap.
Your history rocks hard.
And political instruction.
If we could fund the science to make it to the moon in less than 10 years (an almost impossible thought at that time), imagine how quickly (with the proper stimulus) we could solve most of our societal problems today.
S
Ditto.
Love(d) Roger Waters!
I was having this discussion with a friend at the gym this morning. He didn't think the USSR did anything close to us.
What was the name of their giant rocket that failed on launch which was going to take them to the moon? I seem to remember Nova, but I am probably wrong.
Very educational post, DCap - didn't know about all those failed Soviet missions.
I still remember when Sputnik went up, I was a little kid and was fascinated with the strange-sounding name, Sputnik!
Let's hope feeling competitive with China will make us do what we should be doing anyway - exploring other worlds.
*but I think Pink Floyd sold more than 45 million albums! Luna didn't do that! And Dark Side of the Moon stayed on the Bill Board top 200 for, like, 741 weeks, which is, ah, like ten years or something. Appollo didn't do that!
Which just goes to show that Rock&Roll trumps Rocket Science most everyday!
We can send a man to the moon but we can't come up with a decent healthcare plan. Makes me wonder exactly how much we spent on getting to the moon.
Darkside was one of my favs.
Anyone who read the NY Times from the moment Sputnik went up till the Soviet Union collapsed would have at least held the paper on which the stories of Soviet space were printed.
Americans probably had better access to Soviet Space news than the people who lived in the Soviet Union. The Soviets kept many flights secret, but we tracked them and the news that they had fired something into space was avaialble.
It was, after all, A Space Race. We all knew we were racing them to the Moon.
But the fact that few Americans were deeply moved by the Soviet Space Program does NOT mean there was no coverage of their space flights.
As for Russian technology itself, it has been well known in the US for a very long time. Every mechanical engineering student learns about Stephen Timoshenko. However, it's irrelevant to engineering students that he was a Russian. It was his brilliance at stress analysis and how he applied it to building bridges and other rigid structures that students have cared about.
His influence has lasted. Russians built a lot of heavy equipment using his analysis. They built big heavy airplanes, and jammed huge engines into them. Soviet technology has generally depended on the brute force method to achieve high speed or some other desirable characteristic.
Their rockets were designed in the same spirit.
The Right Stuff is on TV tonight at 10. Always a winner.
Leave, but don't leave me.
i left this quote from apollo 13 in your diary over at the big orange, and i'll copy it here. don't know if jim lovell ever really said it, but i hope someone did:
From now on, we live in a world where man has walked on the moon. And it's not a miracle, we just decided to go.
these facts I did not know nor have I ever heard about so thanks for this informative update. O
Okjimm has a point about the rock album of the decade...
Great job.. I had forgotten about the Russians going to the moon at the same time we did.. I knew they were doing the space thing..but forgot the moon..
You always remind me of what I have forgotten..lol Make my mind work harder...lol I love it.
Another great post, DCap. You are a renaissance man.
For all these engineering & scientific marvels..... in the present, the best NASA could do was recommenD the space station crew put up an *OUT OF ORDER* sign on the space toilet.
Why is that so ironic to me?
Quite literally I would think NASA would have their shit together re the space restroom.... but no.
I do have a suggestion-- send Joe the plumber to space. No charging the government for commute time either. Send Palin too.....
We earthlings have had all we can take of those two.
Thanks for providing the Soviet balance (which is also worthwhile in any balanced overview of WWII).
Tomorrow, I'll post a little more from a July 21 1969 newspaper, hilariously infused with Cold War myopia. Not to mention talk of Vietnam that sounds creepily contemporary in its rhetoric.
thanks to all of you for commenting - call me a kid or old fashioned - i loved the space program - i thought it really brought america to the forefront and showed what we were all about
now we are all about destroying electing people like jon kyl and mitch mcconnell and ensuring we have no discourse or no harmony at all. or idolizing sarah palin.
Dark Side of the Moon has to be one of the top 5 rock albums of all time...has to be...
Post a Comment